.svg)
Ever notice how some teams crush their goals while others can’t seem to link what they do with what the company wants?
Here’s a stat that might surprise you: companies using OKRs hit their business goals 55% more often than those sticking to old-school reviews1. OKRs can bump up employee engagement by 15%, while traditional reviews barely move the needle at 3%1.
If you haven’t looked at your goal-setting and performance management system lately, you could be missing out. In 2025, knowing the difference between OKRs, performance management, and the classic annual review could give your business the boost it needs.
In this blog, we’ll break down what sets OKRs and performance management apart, why mixing them can backfire, and how to use both the smart way. You’ll see how OKRs help teams hit big goals, how performance management builds skills, and how the right tools can help your company hit more targets—minus the usual stress1.
What are OKRs?
OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) help teams and organizations focus, connect, and see their goals clearly. This framework breaks company objectives into time-based, achievable actions called Key Results.
OKRs have two main parts:
- Objectives: Bold, qualitative goals that show where you want to go
- Key Results: Measurable outcomes that track your progress
OKRs work differently from traditional goal systems. They run on a quarterly cycle instead of yearly, which lets businesses stay flexible and adapt to changes quickly. The focus stays on organizational outcomes rather than individual performance metrics.
Experts suggest that hitting about 70% of key results shows success. This target encourages teams to redefine the limits of what's possible without worrying about failure.
What is performance management?
Performance management helps organizations work with employees to accomplish company mission and goals more effectively. Teams and individuals can assess and boost their performance through this system.
The main elements are:
- Goal setting
- Regular performance feedback
- Performance appraisal
- Development planning
- Recognition and rewards
The system typically runs on an annual cycle. It looks at how employees perform compared to their job expectations. Managers and employees work together through this structured, confidential process.
Performance management focuses on employees, unlike OKRs' business-centered approach. It helps develop skills, plan careers, and connect individual work to organizational needs.
The key difference shows in their purpose. OKRs achieve business goals through team effort and openness, while performance management builds individual skills through feedback and evaluation. Companies can use both systems better when they understand this difference, without creating competing incentives.
How exactly can OKRs and performance management be distinguished?
OKRs and performance management show clear differences when compared side by side. Companies that use OKRs see a 30% increase in employee participation. This shows why these differences matter to your organization's success.
1. Focus: OKRs are business-centric at their core. They concentrate on what your organization needs to achieve quarterly. Performance management focuses on individual employee skills and how they match job requirements.
2. Timeframe: These systems work at different paces. OKRs work best in shorter, frequent cycles—usually quarterly—so teams can adapt quickly. Performance management runs on longer, structured cycles that last a year or more.
3. Transparency: OKRs create open communication where everyone shares their objectives and progress openly within the organization. Performance management stays mostly confidential between managers and employees because it often affects compensation decisions.
4. Team vs. Individual: OKRs focus on collective goals and cooperative work (all but one case: small companies or one-person departments). Performance management reviews individual contributions and personal growth.
5. Ambitious vs. Attainable: OKRs push boundaries and stretch capabilities to welcome new ideas. Performance management goals stay more conservative and practical to focus on tactical execution.
6. Compensation Connection: Money makes the biggest difference here. OKRs should stay separate from compensation. Employees will set lower goals if their bonuses depend on OKR completion. This defeats the purpose of setting ambitious targets.
Organizations using OKRs achieved business objectives 55% more often than those using traditional performance management alone. Companies that implemented OKRs saw a 15% boost in employee engagement compared to just 3% for companies using traditional reviews.
These differences matter beyond theory—they help create systems that work together instead of against each other. Understanding these foundations becomes crucial before you try to line up these approaches in your organization.
Why mixing OKRs and performance reviews can backfire
Combining OKRs with traditional performance reviews creates a toxic mix that can derail your company's progress. Companies often learn this lesson the hard way after watching their carefully crafted okr performance management system fall apart.
In this section, we’ll see what backfires the most—like how clashing priorities, mismatched cycles, and tying OKRs to pay can confuse teams, kill innovation, and make people play it safe instead of aiming high
- Focus: Outcomes vs Outputs
OKRs and performance management work on different principles.- OKRs target outcomes—the real changes your team's work creates.
- Performance management measures outputs or activities.
- When you mix these, teams get confused about what matters most. They end up torn between ticking boxes (outputs) and driving real business value (outcomes). The bigger picture gets lost.
- Cycle: Quarterly vs Annual
- OKRs work best on quarterly cycles, letting teams adapt fast.
- Performance reviews are yearly, creating a gap between goal-setting and assessment.
- January goals might be outdated by October, but employees still get judged on them if reviews depend on those objectives.
- Transparency: Open vs Confidential
- OKRs thrive on transparency—everyone sees the objectives and progress.
- Performance management is private, with discussions behind closed doors.
- Merging these approaches leaves people unsure about what they can (or should) share.
- Collaboration: Team vs Individual
- OKRs encourage cross-team collaboration.
- Performance management focuses on individual contributions.
- When pay is linked to team OKRs, people start competing with teammates instead of working together.
- As one expert puts it:
"Instead of working together as a team, people might end up competing with each other to have better results on their goals.”
- Compensation: Decoupled vs Tied
- Companies that linked OKRs to compensation watched their systems crumble.
- Google learned this early—when product usage OKRs were tied to bonuses,
"People started gaming the system to get their bonuses.”
- OKRs are not employee scorecards
- Using OKRs as scorecards misses the point.
- OKRs are about business outcomes and team effort, not measuring individual worth.
- Basing evaluations only on OKRs gives the wrong results.
- Stretch goals don't work with bonuses
- Stretch goals are meant to push teams to new heights.
- When bonuses depend on hitting these goals, people play it safe and set lower targets.
- Ambitious thinking disappears.
- Sandbagging: The hidden risk
- Sandbagging—setting easy goals—becomes the norm when OKRs determine pay.
- People protect themselves by aiming low if missing targets affects their wallet.
- This attitude spreads, and the company stalls.
Trying to blend OKRs with performance reviews usually backfires in all these ways—hurting teamwork, stalling growth, and killing the bold thinking your business needs most
How to align OKRs with performance management (without messing it up)
You might wonder if these systems can work together after seeing the drawbacks of combining OKRs with performance reviews. The good news is they can! A successful okr performance management approach needs careful planning and clear boundaries to boost both systems without compromising either one.
1. Use OKRs to guide, not grade
The golden rule of a working okr performance management system is straightforward: OKRs should provide context for performance discussions, not serve as the only evaluation metric. Direct ties between OKRs and ratings kill their power to inspire ambitious goals. OKRs should act as a compass that points to your business's priorities. Reviews should focus on employee contributions to these goals without reducing their performance to OKR completion percentages.
2. Keep OKRs team-focused, not personal
Teams larger than a handful of people should avoid individual OKRs. These create extra administrative work and change the focus from cooperation to competition. Individual OKRs slow organizations down with too many check-ins and meetings that distract teams from company priorities. Employees will put their own goals first when everyone has personal OKRs. This changes your culture from group-minded to individually competitive.
3. Use check-ins to connect goals and growth
Regular 1:1 meetings should include OKR discussions instead of separate review sessions. A few minutes of each check-in should cover objective progress, blockers, and support needs. This regular rhythm keeps goals on track and will give a clear picture at both individual and team levels. Goals stay relevant and practical when they become part of everyday conversations rather than separate events.
4. Incorporate OKRs into feedback, not ratings
Specific feedback about how employees support team OKRs works better than formulas that connect completion percentages to performance scores.
Examples of good feedback include: "Thank you for referring to our OKRs when prioritizing your tasks" or "When deciding what to work on next, you could pay more attention to the team OKRs currently at risk".
This method reinforces OKR-focused behaviors while protecting the aspirational nature of your objectives.
Real OKRs performance management examples
Companies succeed with OKRs by creating clear links between business objectives and individual performance. To cite an instance, see how companies using OKRs show up to 25% boosted productivity compared to those without a goal-setting framework.
Most organizations set 3-5 objectives per person with quarterly reporting cycles. They create clear connections between individual and organizational goals through weighted key results that link to manager-level priorities. Here are some practical OKRs performance examples:
- Boosting Sales Growth
- The sales team sets an OKR to increase quarterly revenue by 15%.
- Key results track new client acquisitions and upsell opportunities.
- Performance reviews focus on improving negotiation skills and customer follow-up.
- Improving Customer Satisfaction
- Support aims to raise customer satisfaction scores by 10% within six months.
- OKRs track response times and resolution rates.
- Performance management helps agents develop empathy and problem-solving skills.
- Launching a New Product
- The product team’s OKR is to launch a new app feature by the end of Q3.
- Key results include completing development milestones and gathering beta feedback.
- Individual performance goals emphasize collaboration and meeting deadlines.
- Enhancing Employee Engagement
- HR sets an OKR to increase employee engagement scores by 20% over the year.
- Performance discussions focus on leadership training and personalized development plans.
- Streamlining Operations
- Operations targets reducing process bottlenecks by 30%.
- OKRs measure cycle time improvements.
- Performance management supports skill-building in project management and cross-team communication.
- Expanding Market Reach
- Marketing sets an OKR to grow social media followers by 25% and website traffic by 40%.
- Performance reviews encourage creativity and data-driven decision-making to optimize campaigns.
Tips for setting up your OKRs performance management system
Here's how to build an effective system that avoids common pitfalls:
- Pick software that matches your needs—not just feature lists
- Choose tools that keep OKRs separate from compensation
- Find platforms that support transparency and team collaboration
- Select solutions with flexible goal-setting timeframes
- Use systems that give meaningful analytics without becoming scorecards
Note that performance management software serves as a vital tool to improve engagement, boost retention, and build a fair, transparent workplace.
Top Tools to Make OKRs and Performance Management Work in 2025
The 2025 software market features many powerful tools that make okr performance management work for organizations of any size. The right solution can revolutionize how your teams track goals, arrange priorities, and execute strategies.
Top OKRs performance management tools to try
Want software that connects OKRs with performance? These platforms lead the pack in 2025:
ThriveSparrow offers an intuitive OKR experience deeply integrated with performance reviews, feedback loops, and AI-generated personal development plans. Perfect for fast-moving teams, it helps HRs, managers, and employees stay aligned — without the bloat.
Lattice shines at combining OKRs with performance reviews and feedback cycles. This makes it perfect for mid-sized to large organizations that want a unified approach.
Profit.co provides a detailed OKR experience. Its tracking, collaboration, and review features support objectives at company, department, and team levels.
Quantive (formerly Gtmhub) brings enterprise-grade OKR software with advanced automation and immediate analytics. Fast-growing companies that need quick insights will find it especially useful.
15Five combines OKR tracking with employee engagement and performance coaching. This platform helps promote high-performance cultures through transparency.
Leapsome connects OKRs with performance reviews, learning paths, and engagement surveys — making it a great choice for companies focused on continuous growth and feedback.
Perdoo is ideal for organizations new to OKRs. With guided setup, dashboards, and structured goal hierarchies, it makes OKR adoption less overwhelming.
Weekdone is best suited for small teams that want lightweight OKR tracking. Its weekly check-ins and visual dashboards keep goal progress top of mind.
Betterworks supports large organizations with scalable OKR and performance review modules. Its strengths lie in goal visibility, alignment, and structured review workflows.
WorkBoard caters to enterprises managing complex strategic priorities. Its robust OKR features, combined with execution tracking, help leadership teams steer big-picture outcomes.
How ThriveSparrow is the Top Choice for OKRs Performance Management
ThriveSparrow is an all-in-one AI platform designed for continuous employee success, making it the standout choice for OKRs and performance management in 2025. Its OKR module addresses common implementation challenges by:
- Effortless OKR Tracking: Monitor progress in real time with dynamic dashboards and instant projections, so teams always know where they stand.
- Seamless Goal Alignment: Connect individual, team, and company objectives in a structured hierarchy, ensuring everyone moves in the same direction.
- Automated Goal Cycles: Streamline the entire OKR process with automated goal timelines, reducing manual effort and keeping progress consistent.
- Instant Feedback Loops: Enable continuous feedback and recognition, turning goal management into a dynamic, collaborative process.
- Unified Success: ThriveSparrow bridges the gap between personal growth and organizational achievement, enhancing focus, transparency, and accountability across your teams.
Teams using ThriveSparrow report sharper focus, smoother goal cycles, and higher engagement. With its user-friendly interface, customizable features, and powerful analytics, ThriveSparrow empowers organizations to drive results and develop their people simultaneously.
Choose ThriveSparrow to align your teams, boost performance, and achieve your most ambitious goals.
Get started with ThriveSparrow today!
FAQs
Q1. How do OKRs differ from traditional performance management?
OKRs focus on business outcomes and team collaboration, operating on quarterly cycles with transparent goals. Performance management emphasizes individual employee development, typically follows an annual cycle, and involves confidential evaluations.
Q2. Can OKRs be used for individual performance evaluations?
It's not recommended to use OKRs for individual performance evaluations. OKRs are designed to drive business outcomes and team collaboration, not to assess individual worth. Using them as personal scorecards can undermine their effectiveness and lead to goal sandbagging.
Q3. How often should OKRs be reviewed?
OKRs are typically reviewed on a quarterly basis. This allows teams to stay agile and responsive to changing business conditions. Regular check-ins during 1:1 meetings can help keep OKRs on track and relevant throughout the quarter.
Q4. Should OKRs be tied to compensation?
No, it's best to keep OKRs decoupled from compensation. Tying OKRs to bonuses can lead to sandbagging, where employees set easily achievable goals to ensure they meet their targets, which defeats the purpose of setting ambitious, stretch goals.
Q5. What are some top OKR performance management tools in 2025?
Some leading OKR performance management tools in 2025 include ThriveSparrow, Lattice, Profit.co, Quantive (formerly Gtmhub), and 15Five. These platforms offer features like goal tracking, alignment with company objectives, and integration with performance review processes.
